Avery Dennison (NYSE:AVY – Get Free Report) and UFP Technologies (NASDAQ:UFPT – Get Free Report) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.\n\nThis table compares Avery Dennison and UFP Technologies’ top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.\n\nGross Revenue\nPrice/Sales Ratio\nNet Income\nEarnings Per Share\nPrice/Earnings Ratio\nAvery Dennison\n$8.76 billion\n1.54\n$704.90 million\n$8.91\n19.36\nUFP Technologies\n$504.42 million\n3.35\n$58.98 million\n$8.63\n25.37\n\nAvery Dennison has higher revenue and earnings than UFP Technologies. Avery Dennison is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UFP Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.\n\nThis is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Avery Dennison and UFP Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.\n\nSell Ratings\nHold Ratings\nBuy Ratings\nStrong Buy Ratings\nRating Score\nAvery Dennison\n0\n5\n6\n0\n2.55\nUFP Technologies\n0\n1\n1\n0\n2.50\n\nAvery Dennison presently has a consensus price target of $197.60, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. UFP Technologies has a consensus price target of $289.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.99%. Given UFP Technologies’ higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe UFP Technologies is more favorable than Avery Dennison.\n\nAvery Dennison has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, UFP Technologies has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.\n\nThis table compares Avery Dennison and UFP Technologies’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.\n\nNet Margins\nReturn on Equity\nReturn on Assets\nAvery Dennison\n8.14%\n33.14%\n8.91%\nUFP Technologies\n11.40%\n21.54%\n12.00%\n\n94.2% of Avery Dennison shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.3% of UFP Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Avery Dennison shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of UFP Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.\n\nAvery Dennison Corporation operates as a materials science and digital identification solutions company in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, North Africa, Asia, Latin America, and internationally. It provides pressure-sensitive materials comprising papers, plastic films, metal foils, and fabrics; performance tapes products, including tapes for wire harnessing, as well as cable wrapping for automotive, electrical, and general industrial applications; mechanical fasteners, which are precision-extruded and injection-molded plastic devices used in various automotive, general industrial, and retail applications; and other pressure-sensitive adhesive-based materials and converted products under the Fasson, JAC, Yongle, and Avery Dennison brands. The company also offers graphics and reflective products for the architectural, commercial sign, digital printing, and other related market segments; durable cast and reflective films to the construction, automotive, and fleet transportation market segments; reflective films for traffic and safety applications; and pressure-sensitive vinyl and specialty materials designed for digital imaging, screen printing, and sign cutting applications under the Avery Dennison and Mactac brand names. In addition, it provides branding solutions include brand embellishments, graphic tickets, tags, and labels, and sustainable packaging; and information solutions include item-level RFID, visibility and loss prevention, price ticketing and marking, productivity and media solutions, and brand protection and security solutions, as well as care, content, and country of origin compliance solutions. It serves home and personal care, apparel, e-commerce, logistics, food and grocery, pharmaceuticals, and automotive industries. The company was formerly known as Avery International Corporation and changed its name to Avery Dennison Corporation in 1990. Avery Dennison Corporation was founded in 1935 and is headquartered in Mentor, Ohio.\n\nUFP Technologies, Inc. designs and manufactures solutions for medical devices, sterile packaging, and other highly engineered custom products. The company offers protective drapes for robotic surgery, single patient use surfaces, advanced wound care, infection prevention, disposables for surgical and endoscopic procedures, packaging for medical devices, orthopedic implants, biopharma drug manufacturing, and coils for catheters; and molded components for applications in acoustic insulation, interior trim, load floors, sunshades, SUV cargo cover handles, driveshaft damping, engine and manifold covers, quarter panels, and wheel liners. It also provides molded composites for commercial aviation and military gear for use in backpack components, knee and elbow pads, eyewear, and helmets; and reusable cases and custom for applications in military ballistics panels, virtual training systems, drones, communications equipment, and rugged portable computers. In addition, the company provides engineered products and components to customers in the automotive, aerospace and defense, and industrial markets for applications in military uniform and gear components, automotive interior trim, air filtration, and protective cases and inserts. It markets and sells its products through a direct sales force. The company was founded in 1963 and is headquartered in Newburyport, Massachusetts.

Reviewing Avery Dennison (NYSE:AVY) and UFP Technologies (NASDAQ:UFPT)

The article compares Avery Dennison and UFP Technologies, two industrial companies, based on key financial metrics including revenue, earnings, valuation, dividend strength, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk (measured by beta), and profitability. Avery Dennison outperforms UFP Technologies in gross revenue, net income, and earnings per share, and trades at a lower price-to-earnings ratio, indicating better affordability. However, UFP Technologies has a higher potential upside according to analyst price targets, with a 31.99% upside versus Avery Dennison’s 14.57%. UFP Technologies also has higher net margins and return on equity and assets. Avery Dennison has stronger institutional ownership (94.2% vs. 87.3%) and lower volatility (beta of 0.88 vs. 1.14). The article highlights the operational scope and market segments of both companies, noting their global presence and diverse product lines in materials science, medical devices, and industrial applications.